Friday, October 5, 2012

Teachers

Sermon for North Hill Adventist Fellowship
Sabbath, October 6, 2012
This is preliminary draft, subject to copy editing and substantive change.

How to Understand the Bible – Part 3. “Teachers”


As for Philip, an angel of the Lord said to him, "Go south down the desert road that runs from Jerusalem to Gaza." So he started out, and he met the treasurer of Ethiopia, a eunuch of great authority under the Kandake, the queen of Ethiopia. The eunuch had gone to Jerusalem to worship, and he was now returning. Seated in his carriage, he was reading aloud from the book of the prophet Isaiah. The Holy Spirit said to Philip, "Go over and walk along beside the carriage." Philip ran over and heard the man reading from the prophet Isaiah. Philip asked, "Do you understand what you are reading?" The man replied, "How can I, unless someone instructs me?"


And he urged Philip to come up into the carriage and sit with him. The passage of Scripture he had been reading was this: "He was led like a sheep to the slaughter. And as a lamb is silent before the shearers, he did not open his mouth. He was humiliated and received no justice. Who can speak of his descendants? For his life was taken from the earth." The eunuch asked Philip, "Tell me, was the prophet talking about himself or someone else?" So beginning with this same Scripture, Philip told him the Good News about Jesus. As they rode along, they came to some water, and the eunuch said, "Look! There's some water! Why can't I be baptized?" He ordered the carriage to stop, and they went down into the water, and Philip baptized him. When they came up out of the water, the Spirit of the Lord snatched Philip away. The eunuch never saw him again but went on his way rejoicing. Meanwhile, Philip found himself farther north at the town of Azotus. He preached the Good News there and in every town along the way until he came to Caesarea. Acts 8:26-40



About 2000 years ago a Christian named Philip became a celebrity in the city of Samaria. He had come to Samaria because back in Jerusalem the authorities were imprisoning Christians and even killing some of them. Christians scattered all over the Mediterranean world. Philip wound up in Samaria, a non-Jewish city a few days travel north of Jerusalem.

There, he began preaching about Jesus. People were fascinated. Crowds gathered. The more he preached, the bigger the crowds. And, just like the Jesus he preached about, in addition to preaching Philip healed people and cast out demons. Eventually the entire city was talking about this preacher Philip. Thousands got baptized—both men and women, Luke makes a point of saying. (Christianity did not have separate religious practices for men and women as the Jewish religion did. e.g. circumcision.)

The apostles back in Jerusalem heard what was going on and sent Peter and John to check things out. When they arrived they conducted a special prayer service and prayed for the people to receive the Holy Spirit. And it happened.

After a little while Peter and John headed back to Jerusalem. Then something utterly unexpected happened. Philip left town. An angel appeared to him and told him to head back to Jerusalem and then to keep going south out of Jerusalem on the road toward the Sinai desert. Philip followed orders.

Somewhere south of Jerusalem Philip heard a carriage coming along behind him, also headed south. The Holy Spirit told Philip, “Go walk next to the carriage.” Philip did so.

He heard the rich man in the carriage reading. (In those days, when people read, they did not read to themselves the way we do. They read out loud. So Philip heard the man reading from the prophet Isaiah. Philip asked him, “Do you understand what you're reading?”

“How can I?” the man answered. “I have no one to teach me.”

“I could help you with that.”

So the man invited Philip up into the carriage and they moved on south reading and talking as the miles crawled by.

Who was this man? He was the treasurer of Ethiopia, a very powerful man in the administration of Kandake, the queen of Ethiopia. He had been in Jerusalem to worship and was headed back home.

Obviously he was a worshiper of the true God. He may or may not have been officially a member of a synagogue. But he had been to the temple in Jerusalem to worship. He was not “casually” interested in Judaism.

He was reading when Philip joined him. This tells us several things. Obviously he was educated. More than that, he cared deeply about the Bible. People did not have pocket Bibles. Scrolls of the Bible were very, very expensive. Perhaps he had bought this scroll in Jerusalem. For sure, he was serious about studying the Bible. Because he was rich and educated, he had his own copy of the Bible (or at least part of it.)

Still, when Philip asked, “Do you understand it?” he said, “How can I without someone to teach me?”

This is the third in a series on how to understand the Bible. (The technical term used by theologians is hermeneutics. Hermeneutics is the theory of how to correctly interpret the Bible.)

In the first sermon I listed a number of steps or processes for correctly understanding the Bible. Rule Number One was (and is and always will be) READ THE BOOK.

Last week, we talked about a special approach to understanding the Bible, and that is to see it as the “Jesus Book.” Everything in the Bible, the people, the sacrifices, the religious and civic structures set up by God in the OT, everything is connected to Jesus.

This week I'm going to talk about the role of teachers.

The Bible offers some challenging perspectives on the role of teachers.

The eunuch asked Philip, “How can I understand if I have no one to teach me?”

God sent Philip to supply the eunuch's need. A central theme in the stories of the NT is the role of the church as a source of teachers. Paul was converted through the direct intervention of God. But after three days in blindness, God sent a teacher, Ananias to both restore Paul's physical vision and to begin his training in Christianity.

Later in his life, Paul tried to minimize the role of his human teachers.

I received my message from no human source, and no one taught me. Instead, I received it by direct revelation from Jesus Christ. Galatians 1:12

Of course, Paul had been instructed in Christianity by Christian teachers: the very people he was arresting and prosecuting in Jerusalem. He had listened to teachers so convinced of their beliefs they were willing to testify to them in the face of imminent death. Then when Jesus confronted him on the Damascus Road, he compelled the arrogant Pharisee to receive healing and welcome from the very teachers he had been prosecuting.

Then when Paul entered his new Christian ministry what kind of ministry was it? Primarily a teaching ministry. In Acts 18, Luke describes Paul's work in the city of Corinth:

One night the Lord spoke to Paul in a vision and told him, "Don't be afraid! Speak out! Don't be silent! For I am with you, and no one will attack and harm you, for many people in this city belong to me." So Paul stayed there for the next year and a half, teaching the word of God. Acts 18

The people Paul was teaching had access to the OT scriptures. They didn't need Paul to give them the Bible. As for knowledge of the life and teachings of Jesus, Paul was himself a learner. He was dependent on the reports of eye witnesses. Still he had a large role as a teacher. He helped the people of Corinth to see Jesus in the OT. He helped them learn to read the OT as the Jesus Book.

Just as was the case of the Ethiopian eunuch, it was not enough to have the book, they needed the teacher.

How do we understand the Bible? We read it. And we rely on teachers. There are things we will never see in the Bible unless someone helps us see it. The book is not enough.

Richard Davidson, a well-known professor at the Seminary at Andrews University has written a long article about how to correctly interpret the Bible. He begins by stating that Adventists, like other Protestants, believe in the Bible and the Bible Only. He then explains what this means. And part of his explanation is “. . . the Bible alone is sufficient in clarity so that no external source is required to rightly interpret it.”

Davidson's paper can be found here: http://biblicalresearch.gc.adventist.org/documents/interp%20scripture%20davidson.pdf.

But Davidson is wrong. The Bible alone is NOT sufficient. We need teachers. Always have. Always will until we are in the New Earth.

A couple of examples. First from Davidson's own world: Davidson is a strong advocate of the Adventist doctrine that teaches the judgment began in 1844. No one in the last 100 years has ever found that doctrine in the Bible without the help of an Adventist teacher. Of all the billions of people who have read the Bible, not one single person has come even close to guessing the interpretation of Daniel 8:14 that our church teaches. This doctrine requires sources other than the Bible.

If the church is going to retain this doctrine it must maintain an unbroken chain of Adventist teachers. A single generation without those teachers and the doctrine will become extinct. Permanently.

Another example of the danger of attempting to read the Bible without any help. William Miller thought he would study the Bible without teachers. He eventually figured out the approximate date of the Second Coming. Then some of his followers, using his methods, came up with the exact date. October 22, 1844. How did that work out? Thousands of people experienced bitter, devastating disappointment. Over a hundred and fifty years later we are still trying to escape the temptation to figure out “times and seasons” related to the end of the world, distracting us from the real work of spiritual life.

If William Miller had allowed the teaching ministry of classic Christianity to shine some light on his Bible study, he would have realized that Christians have experimented with doomsday scenarios periodically through history. They all follow the same trajectory. And they all end in ignominy.

One of the roles of teachers is helping to protect us from foolishness that comes from our own blind spots.

Walter Vieth is someone in present day Adventism that is repeating William Miller's mistake. He thinks he sees what almost no other theologian or Bible scholar can see. He has misled thousands, perhaps tens of thousands. His presentations feel “true” but they don't stand the test of solid scholarship. Why? Because he himself is operating so far outside his areas of expertise.

For instance he did a series of lectures on Bible manuscripts. He got his facts wrong. More importantly, he got his tone wrong. He suggested to people that they were in danger of being deceived if they read the wrong translation of the Bible. He was wrong. More tragically, he sowed suspicion and distrust between church members.

Based on the teachings and example of Jesus and the teachings and example of Paul, we would expect teachers to play an important role in helping us to rightly understand the Bible.

Having said this, it's important to note a balancing perspective.

And the people of Berea were more open-minded than those in Thessalonica, and they listened eagerly to Paul's message. They searched the Scriptures day after day to see if Paul and Silas were teaching the truth. Acts 17:11

Just because a teacher, even one as prestigious as Paul, says something, that does not make it so. A teacher points us to understandings in the Bible. A teacher can help us see connections we would not otherwise see. But teachers are also susceptible to error. Teachers make mistakes.

Fact check. Even when learning from the most honorable and brilliant teacher.

I remember a Bible teacher adamantly insisting that the sun was the center of the Milky Way galaxy. He was the teacher. He was still wrong. Another teacher told us he had figured out the precise hour of Christ's return. He was wrong.

When evangelists tell you about the rising crime rate in the United States, they are wrong. Violent crime has been decreasing for more than ten years.

When prophecy buffs tell you they have discovered some new secret that sets dates in connection with the end of time, you don't even have to consider their evidence. They are wrong. It's like when you receive an envelope with no return address. You don't need to open it to figure out whether it's important or not. It's not. By definition. No one yet has sent you or me a million dollars in a letter without a return address. And they aren't likely to.

Fact check your teachers.

The Ethiopian eunuch had a good religious life. He had a vital connection with God and a sweet hunger for more. He read the Bible to feed that hunger. And God responded by sending him a teacher to open a whole new vista: Philip taught the eunuch to see Jesus—the fulfillment of a thousand-year-long wait—as the definitive revelation of the person and purpose of God.

If you are cultivating your spiritual life and if you desire more, if you are seeking a deeper relationship with God, God will put teachers in your life as well. Welcome them. Honor them. Fact check them.

Then put what you've learned into practice. Live out what you've been taught. That's the ultimate purpose of teachers.

5 comments:

karolynkas said...

I wish that there were more scholarly pastors who Internet broadcast their sermons and that theology classes from our universities were available for auditing over the Internet. Some of us would like to study deeper, but do not have the accessibility.

karolynkas said...

I woke up thinking of a couple of young friends of mine. Both have fathers who are notorious drug dealers in their communities. These young ladies have had such a fight to find "sanity" in their lives. One has a half dozen children now - the other only three - neither is married. But what I was thinking is that so many girls (and boys) grow up in "bondage" of addictive beliefs, codependency, abuse and other stuff... For both of my friends the bondage is based/justified by common understandings of scripture. (In other countries - the Koran and etc...) The community and the religious doctrines enforce the bondage in subtle ways sometimes that are very much there but maybe outside observers would not "see".
....Their bondage being "broken" when 12 step and abuse recovery programs (in-patient and long term live-in support even for these two) teaches them better ways of thinking and respecting themselves.
Studying to know good theology and teaching and practice really DOES save lives. Not limiting theology to intellectual discussion but also applying it to real life issues is vitally important.
Thanks, Pastor John.

Antinyx said...

Does the fact that teachers can be wrong apply to the authors of the Bible as well? e.g. could we legitimately decide that the Apostle Paul was wrong in his statements about the place of women in ministry and LGBT marriage based on the life and teachings of Jesus?

karolynkas said...

Slavery has been both justified and condemned by serious Bible scholars.
As far as Bible authors - each of us lives in the context of our own world - yes? We wrestle with ethical dilemmas that could not be conceived back in the year 30 AD. Like - who gets a kidney transplant - and are genetically modified foods safe... Or what happens if Iran get the bomb?... Somehow it seems that The Lord has ordained that each generation cannot just rest in the theology of the past but must wrestle out their own understandings and relationship with Him. Life never gets boring - does it?
So, how would YOU answer your question?

Antinyx said...

My answer is yes.

Perhaps Paul's advice was the best He could do given his culture, but just as his attitude toward slavery failed to represent God's highest ideal, so I think his attitude toward marriage and sexual relationships fails to represent God's highest ideal.

Here are the reasons why:
1. God said, "It is not good that man should be alone",
2. Paul himself acknowledged that celibacy is a gift which not all people have,and that if you don't have the gift,
3. "It is better to marry than to burn with lust".
4. I note that God is willing to accommodate less than ideal marital relations, i.e. his concession to divorce, and
5. there are other Biblically acceptable sexual relationships such as polygamy, surrogate sex in the case of widows, and from Jesus, the strong implication that limiting sexual relations to marriage might not even be the heavenly ideal, since after the resurrection there will be no marriage.
6. Jesus was always compassionate toward sexual sins and always tried to minimize the collateral damage and improve whatever relationship remained, (e.g. woman at the well, Mary the foot washer)
7. That love and commitment to long term relationships is good and promiscuity is bad,
8. We now know that gender "choice" is in fact, not a choice but is somehow hard wired, and not amenable to change,

For these reasons, I think Christians ought to support, or at least be tolerant of, marriage in all it's possible forms.

In short, I believe Paul's attitude reflects his own personal history of abuse and represents a failure of his own spiritual maturity rather than an expression of the God's ideal.