Sermon for North Hill Adventist Fellowship
Sabbath, October 6, 2012
This is preliminary draft, subject to copy editing and substantive change.
How to Understand the Bible – Part 3.
“Teachers”
As for Philip, an
angel of the Lord said to him, "Go south
down the desert road that runs from Jerusalem to Gaza." So he
started out, and he met the treasurer of Ethiopia, a eunuch of great
authority under the Kandake, the queen of Ethiopia. The eunuch had
gone to Jerusalem to worship, and he was now returning. Seated in his
carriage, he was reading aloud from the book of the prophet Isaiah.
The Holy Spirit said to Philip, "Go over and walk along beside
the carriage." Philip ran over and heard the man reading from
the prophet Isaiah. Philip asked, "Do you understand what you
are reading?" The man replied, "How can I, unless someone
instructs me?"
And he urged
Philip to come up into the carriage and sit with him. The passage of
Scripture he had been reading was this: "He was led like a sheep
to the slaughter. And as a lamb is silent before the shearers, he did
not open his mouth. He was humiliated and received no justice. Who
can speak of his descendants? For his life was taken from the earth."
The eunuch asked Philip, "Tell me, was the prophet talking about
himself or someone else?" So beginning with this same Scripture,
Philip told him the Good News about Jesus. As they rode along, they
came to some water, and the eunuch said, "Look! There's some
water! Why can't I be baptized?" He ordered the carriage to
stop, and they went down into the water, and Philip baptized him.
When they came up out of the water, the Spirit of the Lord snatched
Philip away. The eunuch never saw him again but went on his way
rejoicing. Meanwhile, Philip found himself farther north at the town
of Azotus. He preached the Good News there and in every town along
the way until he came to Caesarea. Acts 8:26-40
About 2000 years ago a Christian named
Philip became a celebrity in the city of Samaria. He had come to
Samaria because back in Jerusalem the authorities were imprisoning
Christians and even killing some of them. Christians scattered all
over the Mediterranean world. Philip wound up in Samaria, a
non-Jewish city a few days travel north of Jerusalem.
There, he began preaching about Jesus.
People were fascinated. Crowds gathered. The more he preached, the
bigger the crowds. And, just like the Jesus he preached about, in
addition to preaching Philip healed people and cast out demons.
Eventually the entire city was talking about this preacher Philip.
Thousands got baptized—both men and women, Luke makes a point of
saying. (Christianity did not have separate religious practices for
men and women as the Jewish religion did. e.g. circumcision.)
The apostles back in Jerusalem heard
what was going on and sent Peter and John to check things out. When
they arrived they conducted a special prayer service and prayed for
the people to receive the Holy Spirit. And it happened.
After a little while Peter and John
headed back to Jerusalem. Then something utterly unexpected happened.
Philip left town. An angel appeared to him and told him to head back
to Jerusalem and then to keep going south out of Jerusalem on the
road toward the Sinai desert. Philip followed orders.
Somewhere south of Jerusalem Philip
heard a carriage coming along behind him, also headed south. The Holy
Spirit told Philip, “Go walk next to the carriage.” Philip did
so.
He heard the rich man in the carriage
reading. (In those days, when people read, they did not read to
themselves the way we do. They read out loud. So Philip heard the man
reading from the prophet Isaiah. Philip asked him, “Do you
understand what you're reading?”
“How can I?” the man answered. “I
have no one to teach me.”
“I could help you with that.”
So the man invited Philip up into the
carriage and they moved on south reading and talking as the miles
crawled by.
Who was this man? He was the treasurer
of Ethiopia, a very powerful man in the administration of Kandake,
the queen of Ethiopia. He had been in Jerusalem to worship and was
headed back home.
Obviously he was a worshiper of the
true God. He may or may not have been officially a member of a
synagogue. But he had been to the temple in Jerusalem to worship. He
was not “casually” interested in Judaism.
He was reading when Philip joined him.
This tells us several things. Obviously he was educated. More than
that, he cared deeply about the Bible. People did not have pocket
Bibles. Scrolls of the Bible were very, very expensive. Perhaps he
had bought this scroll in Jerusalem. For sure, he was serious about
studying the Bible. Because he was rich and educated, he had his own
copy of the Bible (or at least part of it.)
Still, when Philip asked, “Do you
understand it?” he said, “How can I without someone to teach me?”
This is the third in a series on how to
understand the Bible. (The technical term used by theologians is
hermeneutics. Hermeneutics is the theory of how to correctly
interpret the Bible.)
In the first sermon I listed a number
of steps or processes for correctly understanding the Bible. Rule
Number One was (and is and always will be) READ THE BOOK.
Last week, we talked about a special
approach to understanding the Bible, and that is to see it as the
“Jesus Book.” Everything in the Bible, the people, the
sacrifices, the religious and civic structures set up by God in the
OT, everything is connected to Jesus.
This week I'm going to talk about the
role of teachers.
The Bible offers some challenging
perspectives on the role of teachers.
The eunuch asked Philip, “How can I
understand if I have no one to teach me?”
God sent Philip to supply the eunuch's
need. A central theme in the stories of the NT is the role of the
church as a source of teachers. Paul was converted through the direct
intervention of God. But after three days in blindness, God sent a
teacher, Ananias to both restore Paul's physical vision and to begin
his training in Christianity.
Later in his life, Paul tried to
minimize the role of his human teachers.
I received my
message from no human source, and no one taught me. Instead, I
received it by direct revelation from Jesus Christ. Galatians 1:12
Of course, Paul had been instructed in
Christianity by Christian teachers: the very people he was arresting
and prosecuting in Jerusalem. He had listened to teachers so
convinced of their beliefs they were willing to testify to them in
the face of imminent death. Then when Jesus confronted him on the
Damascus Road, he compelled the arrogant Pharisee to receive healing
and welcome from the very teachers he had been prosecuting.
Then when Paul entered his new
Christian ministry what kind of ministry was it? Primarily a teaching
ministry. In Acts 18, Luke describes Paul's work in the city of
Corinth:
One night the Lord
spoke to Paul in a vision and told him, "Don't be afraid! Speak
out! Don't be silent! For I am with you, and no one will attack and
harm you, for many people in this city belong to me." So Paul
stayed there for the next year and a half, teaching the word of God.
Acts 18
The people Paul was teaching had access
to the OT scriptures. They didn't need Paul to give them the Bible.
As for knowledge of the life and teachings of Jesus, Paul was himself
a learner. He was dependent on the reports of eye witnesses. Still he
had a large role as a teacher. He helped the people of Corinth to see
Jesus in the OT. He helped them learn to read the OT as the Jesus
Book.
Just as was the case of the Ethiopian
eunuch, it was not enough to have the book, they needed the teacher.
How do we understand the Bible? We read
it. And we rely on teachers. There are things we will never see in
the Bible unless someone helps us see it. The book is not enough.
Richard Davidson, a well-known
professor at the Seminary at Andrews University has written a long
article about how to correctly interpret the Bible. He begins by
stating that Adventists, like other Protestants, believe in the Bible
and the Bible Only. He then explains what this means. And part of his
explanation is “. . . the Bible alone is sufficient in clarity so
that no external source is required to rightly interpret it.”
Davidson's paper can be found here:
http://biblicalresearch.gc.adventist.org/documents/interp%20scripture%20davidson.pdf.
But Davidson is wrong. The Bible alone
is NOT sufficient. We need teachers. Always have. Always will until
we are in the New Earth.
A couple of examples. First from
Davidson's own world: Davidson is a strong advocate of the Adventist
doctrine that teaches the judgment began in 1844. No one in the last
100 years has ever found that doctrine in the Bible without the help
of an Adventist teacher. Of all the billions of people who have read
the Bible, not one single person has come even close to guessing the
interpretation of Daniel 8:14 that our church teaches. This doctrine
requires sources other than the Bible.
If the church is going to retain this
doctrine it must maintain an unbroken chain of Adventist teachers. A
single generation without those teachers and the doctrine will become
extinct. Permanently.
Another example of the danger of
attempting to read the Bible without any help. William Miller thought
he would study the Bible without teachers. He eventually figured out
the approximate date of the Second Coming. Then some of
his followers, using his methods, came up with the exact
date. October 22, 1844. How did that work out? Thousands of people
experienced bitter, devastating disappointment. Over a hundred and
fifty years later we are still trying to escape the temptation to
figure out “times and seasons” related to the end of the world,
distracting us from the real work of spiritual life.
If William Miller had allowed the
teaching ministry of classic Christianity to shine some light on his
Bible study, he would have realized that Christians have experimented
with doomsday scenarios periodically through history. They all follow
the same trajectory. And they all end in ignominy.
One of the roles of teachers is helping
to protect us from foolishness that comes from our own blind spots.
Walter Vieth is someone in present day
Adventism that is repeating William Miller's mistake. He thinks he
sees what almost no other theologian or Bible scholar can see. He has
misled thousands, perhaps tens of thousands. His presentations feel
“true” but they don't stand the test of solid scholarship. Why?
Because he himself is operating so far outside his areas of
expertise.
For instance he did a series of
lectures on Bible manuscripts. He got his facts wrong. More
importantly, he got his tone wrong. He suggested to people that they
were in danger of being deceived if they read the wrong translation
of the Bible. He was wrong. More tragically, he sowed suspicion and
distrust between church members.
Based on the teachings and example of
Jesus and the teachings and example of Paul, we would expect teachers
to play an important role in helping us to rightly understand the
Bible.
Having said this, it's important to
note a balancing perspective.
And the people of
Berea were more open-minded than those in Thessalonica, and they
listened eagerly to Paul's message. They searched the Scriptures day
after day to see if Paul and Silas were teaching the truth. Acts
17:11
Just because a teacher, even one as
prestigious as Paul, says something, that does not make it so. A
teacher points us to understandings in the Bible. A teacher can help
us see connections we would not otherwise see. But teachers are also
susceptible to error. Teachers make mistakes.
Fact check. Even when learning from the
most honorable and brilliant teacher.
I remember a Bible teacher adamantly
insisting that the sun was the center of the Milky Way galaxy. He was
the teacher. He was still wrong. Another teacher told us he had
figured out the precise hour of Christ's return. He was wrong.
When evangelists tell you about the
rising crime rate in the United States, they are wrong. Violent crime
has been decreasing for more than ten years.
When prophecy buffs tell you they have
discovered some new secret that sets dates in connection with the end
of time, you don't even have to consider their evidence. They are
wrong. It's like when you receive an envelope with no return address.
You don't need to open it to figure out whether it's important or
not. It's not. By definition. No one yet has sent you or me a million
dollars in a letter without a return address. And they aren't likely
to.
Fact check your teachers.
The Ethiopian eunuch had a good
religious life. He had a vital connection with God and a sweet hunger
for more. He read the Bible to feed that hunger. And God responded by
sending him a teacher to open a whole new vista: Philip taught the
eunuch to see Jesus—the fulfillment of a thousand-year-long wait—as
the definitive revelation of the person and purpose of God.
If you are cultivating your spiritual
life and if you desire more, if you are seeking a deeper relationship
with God, God will put teachers in your life as well. Welcome them.
Honor them. Fact check them.
Then put what you've learned into
practice. Live out what you've been taught. That's the ultimate
purpose of teachers.
5 comments:
I wish that there were more scholarly pastors who Internet broadcast their sermons and that theology classes from our universities were available for auditing over the Internet. Some of us would like to study deeper, but do not have the accessibility.
I woke up thinking of a couple of young friends of mine. Both have fathers who are notorious drug dealers in their communities. These young ladies have had such a fight to find "sanity" in their lives. One has a half dozen children now - the other only three - neither is married. But what I was thinking is that so many girls (and boys) grow up in "bondage" of addictive beliefs, codependency, abuse and other stuff... For both of my friends the bondage is based/justified by common understandings of scripture. (In other countries - the Koran and etc...) The community and the religious doctrines enforce the bondage in subtle ways sometimes that are very much there but maybe outside observers would not "see".
....Their bondage being "broken" when 12 step and abuse recovery programs (in-patient and long term live-in support even for these two) teaches them better ways of thinking and respecting themselves.
Studying to know good theology and teaching and practice really DOES save lives. Not limiting theology to intellectual discussion but also applying it to real life issues is vitally important.
Thanks, Pastor John.
Does the fact that teachers can be wrong apply to the authors of the Bible as well? e.g. could we legitimately decide that the Apostle Paul was wrong in his statements about the place of women in ministry and LGBT marriage based on the life and teachings of Jesus?
Slavery has been both justified and condemned by serious Bible scholars.
As far as Bible authors - each of us lives in the context of our own world - yes? We wrestle with ethical dilemmas that could not be conceived back in the year 30 AD. Like - who gets a kidney transplant - and are genetically modified foods safe... Or what happens if Iran get the bomb?... Somehow it seems that The Lord has ordained that each generation cannot just rest in the theology of the past but must wrestle out their own understandings and relationship with Him. Life never gets boring - does it?
So, how would YOU answer your question?
My answer is yes.
Perhaps Paul's advice was the best He could do given his culture, but just as his attitude toward slavery failed to represent God's highest ideal, so I think his attitude toward marriage and sexual relationships fails to represent God's highest ideal.
Here are the reasons why:
1. God said, "It is not good that man should be alone",
2. Paul himself acknowledged that celibacy is a gift which not all people have,and that if you don't have the gift,
3. "It is better to marry than to burn with lust".
4. I note that God is willing to accommodate less than ideal marital relations, i.e. his concession to divorce, and
5. there are other Biblically acceptable sexual relationships such as polygamy, surrogate sex in the case of widows, and from Jesus, the strong implication that limiting sexual relations to marriage might not even be the heavenly ideal, since after the resurrection there will be no marriage.
6. Jesus was always compassionate toward sexual sins and always tried to minimize the collateral damage and improve whatever relationship remained, (e.g. woman at the well, Mary the foot washer)
7. That love and commitment to long term relationships is good and promiscuity is bad,
8. We now know that gender "choice" is in fact, not a choice but is somehow hard wired, and not amenable to change,
For these reasons, I think Christians ought to support, or at least be tolerant of, marriage in all it's possible forms.
In short, I believe Paul's attitude reflects his own personal history of abuse and represents a failure of his own spiritual maturity rather than an expression of the God's ideal.
Post a Comment