Sermon manuscript
for Green Lake Church of Seventh-day Adventists
For Sabbath, June
30, 2015
Texts: Psalm
106:21-23, Luke 13:6-9
(In our service today, we pay special tribute to all our graduates. We honor their academic achievements and call them to service.)
The story begins, “A
man planted a fig tree in his garden.”
Some of you will
hear this and immediately imagine putting your kids in the car and
going to Sky Nursery or some other local plant dealer or maybe to
Home Depot or Lowes or McClendons. There you will wander among the
enticing specimens until you find just the right tree. You go through
check out, then scratch your head trying to figure out how to get it
home. You manage to fit the pot on the floor behind the passenger
seat tipped at a forty-five degree angle so the branches are in the
face of your kid sitting in the back on the left side of the car.
That kid is not happy.
You get home and
dig a hole for this tree. The ground is rocky. You have to use a pick
or digging bar. After excavating a hole large enough to bury your
car, you empty into it the two bags of top soil you bought. You are
surprised that the two bags which loomed so large in the trunk of
your car appear to be merely teaspoons of dirt in the hole. But it's
what you have. You slide the tree out of its pot and carefully set it
in place on the little bump of topsoil. You fill the hole with water,
then begin shoveling the remaining dirt into the hole.
You baby your tree
through the year, watering it in summer, wrapping it with burlap
during cold snaps. It survives the first winter and leafs out, but no
figs.
Oh well. Next year.
The second summer
still no figs.
The third summer.
STILL no figs.
You google “barren
fig trees.” You learn everything there is to learn about
encouraging fig trees to fruit. Years go by. You spend money and time
chasing your dream of figs.
If this is what
comes to mind when you read the opening line of this story, you'll
miss a key element of the story.
“A man planted a
fig tree in his garden.”
This man is a
landowner, a wealthy farmer. Like a major apple grower in eastern
Washington or an almond farmer in central California. He is an
executive farmer. When the Gospel says, “He planted a fig tree,”
the word plant in that sentence means something similar to the word
“play” in the sentence we played in the Superbowl this year. The
man planted the tree vicariously. He said to Manuel, “Manuel, I
think a fig tree would work great here on the terrace. Can you make
sure we get one in the ground this season?”
Manuel dug in the
rocky soil. Manuel added soil amendments. Manuel kept it watered
through that first summer. The next summer, at some point, when the
farmer noticed there were no figs on the tree, he was glad Manuel was
taking good care of it so that surely next year there would be figs.
The next summer
again, at some point the executive farmer, the land owner, noticed
there were no figs on the tree. Oh well.
Of course, all this
time, Manuel was managing the irrigation on the farm. He made sure
the tree was getting adequate moisture. Manuel did the pruning.
The third summer,
the farmer again notices the lack of figs on the tree. “Hey,
Manuel. What's up with this tree? We should have figs by now. This
tree is taking up space and water that could be put to better use.
Cut it down and let's get something here that will produce.”
It was an easy
decision for the farmer. He was an executive. He was used to making
decisions with an eye to productivity only. The farmer's only
interest in the tree was what it could produce. The farmer had no
personal investment in the tree.
Manuel, of course,
also wanted the tree to produce. But Manuel was attached to the tree.
He had spent three years watching it nearly every day. He had
directed irrigation water. He had watched for bugs. Manuel was
attached to the tree. Manuel wanted fruit, of course. He was, after
all, a gardener. He wanted fruit yes. But he specifically wanted to
see THIS TREE produce fruit.
Manuel objected to
cutting down the tree. “Not yet. Give it one more chance. Leave it
another year, and I'll give it special attention and plenty of
fertilizer. If we get figs next year, fine. If not, then you can cut
it down."
The end.
Jesus' story does
not tell us if the gardener was successful. He does tell us if the
tree started producing. The story leaves us hoping. We don't want the
tree cut down. We hope Manuel will be successful. We don't want him
to be disappointed. We hope for the tree.
This story offers
profound wisdom for graduates.
In our society,
graduation marks the acquisition of power. Graduation opens the door
for advancement. You graduate from preschool, and this opens the door
to kindergarten. You graduate from kindergarten, and the door opens
to first grade. We pass through high school and a diploma opens the
door to college or a job. A bachelors' degree increases your
employability or sets you up for graduate school. A master's or Ph.
D. again opens doors. (At least we hope it does.)
With each advance,
we acquire greater power to make a difference, to shape what happens
in the world. Higher education frequently opens the door to higher
status in society, increased opportunity to influence what happens to
other people.
As a Church, the
question we ask is, “What are you going to do with that power?”
Who is the
landowner? Who is the gardener?
In classic
Christian interpretation, God is the landowner and Jesus is the
gardener. The story is a warning to the Jewish people in the context
of Jesus' ministry. Jesus has been preaching for three years and
still the nation hasn't repented. They have one more year before
their final judgment.
But what does this
story say to us? The landowner and the gardener represent two
different views of God. The fig tree represents people.
The landowner, the
executive farmer, is concerned about production only. The tree
produces or does not produce. If it doesn't produce, cut it down. Get
rid of it. Applied to people, God is watching. If you don't produce,
beware, God will cut you off.
The gardener is
concerned with production and with the tree. Applied to people, Jesus
aims to see people reach their greatest potential. If they are
unproductive, Jesus asks what can be done to help them grow. How can
they do better?
Since we are
Christians, we understand Jesus to be the supreme revelation of God.
The other picture of God, the vision of God as the stern, even
ruthless landowner pursuing the sole objective of maximum production
is something we pointedly reject. That is not what God is like. That
is not a model for moral behavior.
The highest
morality is characterized by hope and mercy. Yes, in this story there
is an awareness of limits. At some point, even the gardener would
agree the tree needs to be cut down. But that is seen as exceptional,
unlikely, undesirable.
Graduates, your
education has given you power. The power of knowledge and skill, the
power of credentials. How will you use that power?
Will you act like
the landowner—ruthlessly eliminating everyone who fails to live up
to their potential, everyone who is less productive than you imagine
you would be if you were in their place? Or will you join Jesus, in
cultivating people, in working to help them live better?
Will you work in
hope?
This is our highest
calling. This is the truest purpose of education.
(We can find support
of the idea of two views of God elsewhere in the Bible. Moses at
Sinai bluntly countermanded God's verdict of annihilation, Abraham
defended the Sodomites, the Woman of Tekoa persuaded David to
overturn the law of capital punishment, the Syrophonecian woman
blithely dismissed Jesus' statement of the limits on his mission. In
each of these cases, the explicit statement of God's will—which was
destructive—is reversed or qualified and the reversal or
qualification is clearly shown to be the “higher will” of God.)
No comments:
Post a Comment