Wednesday, February 20, 2013

Blessed Are Those Who Mourn

Sermon manuscript for Green Lake Church of Seventh-day Adventists
Sabbath, February 16, 2013
Text: Matthew 5:4

Years ago, new in a parish, I was visiting folks, getting acquainted. Sylvia and Robert lived in a little house in a working class neighborhood. Robert had spent forty years in a Goodyear factory. Sylvia had worked as a bookkeeper. We sat in the living room to talk. Just minutes into our visit Sylvia began telling me a heart-breaking story. Her daughter had drowned. This was in the days before cell phones. It was hours before she learned the terrible news. Sylvia rehearsed the details: A beautiful, sunny day. The lake where they had often gone as a family. The group of girlfriends her daughter had gone with.

As I listened, I felt a certain cognitive dissonance. It was clear from Sylvia's anguish and the sharp details in her telling that this accident had happened recently, this past summer or maybe the summer before. It sounded like a story about a group of teenage girls on a picnic. But Sylvia was in her eighties. Maybe I hadn't heard right. Maybe it was Sylvia's granddaughter. I didn't get it. Then Sylvia mentioned this had happened three days after her daughter's sixteenth birthday. Sylvia had been mourning her daughter for forty years. And sitting there listening to Sylvia, it seemed to me her grief was as sharp and cutting as if it had happened yesterday.

* * * *

If Sylvia had been in the crowd listening when Jesus said, “Blessed are those who mourn, they will be comforted,” how would his words have helped?

Sylvia believed in the resurrection. She looked forward to the grand reunion of heaven. She did not doubt any of the promises Christians cling to in the face of death. But after forty years of believing in the resurrection, she was still waiting for the comfort.

So what was Jesus saying to Sylvia?

In the crowds who gathered around Jesus to listen to his wisdom and receive healing, most of the adults would have had direct experience with mourning. In Jesus' world more than half of all children died. Every mother was a grieving mother. Every dad was haunted by the memory of a son who had carried his dreams, had carried them until both son and dreams were killed by diarrhea or typhus or the plague or gangrene.

Jesus' world was full of early death. Children and teenagers, mother's in childbirth, dads in the prime of life with a gaggle of kids at home, depending on them. When Jesus looked out at the crowds, he knew they were achingly familiar with grief. So when he spoke of mourning, it was not theoretical. It was not “spiritual.” Jesus was not talking about mourning for their sins. He was talking about grieving for their children.

Blessed are those who mourn, for they will be comforted.

Some versions of the Bible translate Jesus' words as, “Happy are those who mourn . . . .” It's a very unfortunate translation. Using the word “happy” here, implies that Jesus trivialized human pain or maybe even worse, that he spiritualized it. Jesus did neither.

(According to the “spiritual” view, when Jesus spoke of mourning, he wasn't addressing the pain of losing a loved one. Rather he was speaking of people “mourning” for the effects of their sinful actions, grieving for the pain their sin has caused to the heart of God. In this interpretation, Jesus was commending people who “mourn” over the pain they have caused instead of offering consolation to people suffering great pain. The “spiritual view” disconnects Jesus' teachings from real life and contradicts the overall portrait of Jesus given in the Gospel of Matthew. When Jesus blessed those who mourn, he was talking about the loss that haunts our lives because of death, not the guilt that haunts our lives because of our own misdeeds.)

When Jesus pronounced a blessing on those who mourn, he was not, even for an instant, suggesting they were happy. He was not minimizing their pain. He did not spiritualize their pain. He honored their pain by acknowledging it and by speaking to it on behalf of God.

When we mourn, we feel cursed. The world goes dark. Life becomes tasteless and uninteresting. Pleasure becomes impossible. Every happiness is haunted by the keen awareness of our loss. God himself becomes part of the problem.

“Why did you allow it?”
“Why did you let me get my heart so wrapped up in that person?”
“Why didn't you avert the tragedy, the accident? Why didn't you cure the disease?”
“Why didn't you let me die instead?”

It is a short step from all this questioning to wondering why God is so mad at you. Why did God curse you? Grief feels like a curse.

Into these dark thoughts, Jesus' words come: Blessed are those who mourn. Blessed, not cursed. God notices your grief. He is touched by it. He has tender regard for you. You are blessed.

The heaviness of your heart is not the testimony of God against you. Rather, the heaviness of your heart is evidence that you have obeyed the commandment to love.

We mourn only those we love. The world is full of tragedies. Death stalks every corner of earth. But when someone we love dies . . . that is when we are stricken with grief. When you love someone, you never have enough time together. A life time is too short. When love is interrupted by death or other wrenching separations, we grieve. We mourn. The very fact that you are grieving is evidence of your courage to love. No wonder Jesus blesses you. No wonder Jesus says that no matter how intense your pain and dark your heart, God regards you with favor. This is what it means to be blessed.

Not necessarily happy, just regarded favorably by God.

Sometimes we want to hurry the blessing to completion. We want Sylvia to quit mourning her daughter. We want old friends to get over their inconsolable grief at the loss of their spouse of fifty years. We want to talk about the promise of resurrection, not about the reality of present loss. But this kind of hurry is a departure from our calling as agents of the kingdom of heaven. The model set for us by Jesus (in line with Jewish tradition going back a thousand years before him) was complete engagement here and now with real life as it happens in the real world.

In our world, we are much less likely to lose a child to death. But we are more likely to confront another grief.

A month or two ago I was listening to Steve Scher on Weekday. He was talking about parents of children autism disorders. I listened to a couple of mothers describe their efforts to secure proper service from the school system and adequate help from the various medical resources. Then a dad called in.

He, too, was a tireless advocate for his son, trying to get help, trying to create a life for his son. Then this dad described the eternal ache he carried for the son who would never be. He choked up as he described a dad's dreams of tossing a football with his son. He talked of dreams of going camping and teaching his son to fish. Dreams, that in the case of his son, could never turn into life. Dreams he had to give up, if he was going to be fully present for the son he actually had, instead of the son he had dreamed of.

He lived in the impossibly complicated world where the very exercise of his love for his son who was disabled kept constantly alive his grief for the son who never was. What a weight to carry. What heights of nobility. What depths of pain.

When Jesus speaks to this father, Jesus does not say: “How happy you are.” Jesus says, “You are blessed.” God sees your love and your grief. God knows all the complicated, topsy-turvy emotions of your world, the resentment and hope, the affection and weariness. The tears. God sees it and God's word to you is “blessing.” Grace and peace to you.

Then Jesus goes on to promise: You will be comforted.

One of the central claims of Christianity is that God is planning a bright future, a future so bright and sweet and rich and beautiful that all grief, all loss, even all injustice will finally be redeemed. The book of Revelation promises that God will wipe away every tear. Paul wrote that Jesus will gather all people into an eternity of bliss. Jesus himself foresaw a future kingdom ruled by righteousness, beyond death and loss and pain.

Jesus said to the thousands of grieving people listening to him preach—and in his audiences the vast majority of adults were grieving—you will be comforted.

Jesus did not pretend that they were happy here and now. The comfort he spoke of was future. Jesus did not trivialize or spiritualize their present loss. He recognized it for what it was: an incurable pain. Then he said to those caught up in the sharp pain of recent loss and to those carrying decades of ache: you are blessed. God is with you. God is for you. And some day God will provide comfort commensurate with the enormity of your pain.

It is the ultimate promise. The Book of Revelation pictures that bright future as a golden city, the New Jerusalem where it is forever bright.

I saw a new heaven and a new earth . . . I heard a loud voice from heaven shouting, “God will wipe every tear from their eyes. There will be no more death or mourning or crying or pain, for the old order of things has passed away.” He who was seated on the throne said, "I am making everything new!" Revelation 21:1-5

Adventists celebrate that future as the climax of the “Great Controversy.” We insist that beyond the chaos and trauma of this world is a future so rich it will be worth the journey to get there.

The entire universe is clean. One pulse of harmony and gladness beats through the vast creation. From Him who created all, flow life and light and gladness, throughout the realms of illimitable space. (Page 678, The Great Controversy by Ellen G White )

Blessed are those who mourn. They will be comforted. And the comfort will be sufficient.


These words were intended to offer solace, to offer encouragement and grace. They also describe our mission as agents of the kingdom of heaven. We are to bring blessing to those who mourn. How do we do that?

What is our calling the face of Sylvia's forty-year long mourning? How do we respond to that father's magnificent service and soul-bending grief? How do we touch lives now with the blessing Jesus pronounced?

When our youngest daughter was born, she had a twin brother. It was a crash C-section because he was in distress. He was resuscitated and raced to the NICU. A few hours later we were told the bad news. He was a trisomy 13. With aggressive medical intervention he might live for a year or two. Right now, he was being kept alive by a spider web of medical technology. What did we want to do?

We did not want to see this little, misshapen boy endure the torments of tubes and electrodes and breathing assistance when the only future was more of the same until he was gone. So we decided to end life support.

I sat in the NICU while they gently unplugged and untaped and disconnected. Finally, all the wires and tubes were gone, and the nurse placed him in my arms and I held my son while he died.

A doctor and nurse sat with me. They didn't say anything. They didn't go anywhere. They answered no pages. They didn't stir. They just sat with me while the minutes passed. For more than half an hour we kept silent vigil as Douglas slowly expired.

I have some idea of the demands on medical staff. They never have nothing to do. They don't have extra half hours. I was astonished that this doctor and nurse would lavish this kind of time on me. And deeply touched.

There was nothing they could have said that would make the situation any less painful. Talking about the medical realities would have been beside the point. We had already covered those. Talking about the incidence of this particular birth defect would not have been illuminating. Discussing the ethics of our decision to withdraw life support would have been inappropriate at that point. And certainly talking about heaven would have been a mockery of the loss we faced.

So this doctor and nurse offered me the richest, most powerful blessing they could—their presence.

Jesus, looking at crowds of thousands who included a majority of people who had experienced loss, pronounced them blessed. We who do not have audiences of thousands—we have friends and neighbors and relatives who are mourning. Maybe they are living with a forty-year-old grief like Sylvia. Maybe they have lost a child. Maybe they are living with a child who is a constant reminder of the parent's dream that will never come true.

No matter the nature of the grief carried by the people around us, all of them need the reassurance Jesus spoke: you are blessed. And we can be most effective in making Jesus' words real by giving to those who grieve our presence, our gentle attention. As we do this, we will communicate the word of blessing, and we will convey at least a hint of the eternal comfort to come.

Blessed are those who mourn, they will be comforted.

16 comments:

design trends said...

Hey John

How awesome! I recently preached a sermon on this same topic. I did take a totally different angle though. I invite you to check it out here:

http://www.jesusadventismandi.com/2013/02/happy-are-those-who-are-sad.

I understood the text to be talking, not about suffering pain, but about experiencing true sorrow for sin. I know you disagree with that view but maybe we can chat about it.

Totally not a big deal, but fun to dig into.

Later!

John McLarty said...

@Marcos. Your interpretation is supported by the preponderance of tradition. Short pithy statements like the beatitudes lend themselves to a variety of interpretations.

I see nothing theologically wrong with the traditional interpretation (mourning for sin). I simply see nothing in the text to support it as the best read of the actual words of this particular text.

The traditional interpretation has Jesus addressing the pain we have caused. (We mourn for the pain our sins have caused to God or other people.) I see nothing anywhere else in the Gospel of Matthew that seconds that interpretation. I believe Jesus was addressing the pain we have suffered.

design trends said...

Hey John

Its great to read your point of view and see where you are coming from. I guess what keeps me in the traditional view is that the preceding and following texts are are speaking spiritually. However, I also would say that the more I think about it the more it seems like both ways of looking at it can be correct since they are not mutually exclusive.

Happy are those who are sad because of their sins. Why? Because I will cheer them up (comfort them). This is a reality I have experienced in my own life. I didn't know true happiness until i experienced true repentance and in turn, the comforting hand of Jesus.

Or Happy are those who have had a rough life. Why? Same reason, I will cheer them up. I have experienced this in my life as well.

So I think it can be safely viewed in both ways.

John McLarty said...

@Marcos. It seems to me that your response is theological. As I said before, I have no disagreement with the classic theological assertion that it is a good thing to recognize the harm our sins have caused.

I disagree that the first and third beatitudes are speaking spiritually. "Poor in spirit" is a miserable state. It is not commendable. (I.e. "poor in spirit" is not the same thing as "recognizing my need of spiritual enrichment." Jesus said nothing about a person's awareness of their spiritual poverty, rather he addressed people in the lamentable condition of being spiritually poor.) If you wish, you can check out my sermon on this beatitude which posted on this blog site or my slightly more technical discussion on the Green Lake Church site: http://greenlakesda.org/ideas-discussion/

Mourning is a miserable state.

Meekness is a miserable state. It is not commendable. It is lamentable. It is a condition which Jesus promises will be eventually reversed. Just as ultimately we will leave behind our spiritual poverty and our mourning, so we will leave behind our meekness. (We ought to interpret Jesus' use of the word "meek" in light of its use in the Psalms, not its later use by Paul or Peter.)

Jesus is pronouncing blessing on people who are in painful, difficult situations. Jesus is not commending people for their advancement along a spiritual path that leads to the supreme accomplishment of being persecuted for righteousness sake. I don't believe the Beatitudes map a path of any kind. They are not systematic. They do not offer a template for spiritual development. And for sure I don't believe that the climax of spiritual development, the supreme accomplishment in spirituality, is to be persecuted. Persecution is not blessed state we aim for. It is a tragic situation which elicits the blessing of Jesus precisely because it is so painful--not because it is the highest step on the ladder of Christian perfection.

karolynkas said...

Thank you, John.
*******
@ Marcos - Theology, religion & church have become so analytical & institutionalized that, often, they becomes disconnected with real life. That is one reason why the younger generation (and I was ONCE the younger generation - now I am talking about my children and grandchildren...) see no use in them. Do we, many who have spent our lives "being good", have to be consumed with guilt in order to be "blessed"? (And I deeply and sincerely am convicted that theology would be more balanced if more women were writing it!)
I one was at a women's retreat that was lead by a lady - who, decades later, became the GC women's ministry leader... In that weekend - after talking about serious real-life things... the kind of things that are not discussed in groups of SDA saints who are "happy" and "blessed" - but things that are in our real world experience... After a weekend of discussion and presentations of those things which weigh so deeply on the hearts of mothers and grandmothers... We had such a communion service that I have never before or since experienced. You have not, either, because you have not been in an exclusively lady's group when they were talking about the deep things of their hearts.
What impressed me most - when it became OK to talk about the real things in our hearts - there is so very much grief and angst and sorrowing over children and sin and the dark side of life. But in the church community it is NOT OK to talk and hug and pray and cry tears with each other - because we already want to be "happy" and "blessed". I sometimes wonder if our world is addicted to happiness - if you mourn or fret over things that are evil - then you should go to counseling and take zoloft and pray and eat better and exercise... - it is NOT OK to have a situation that we do not have an immediate answer for or to be imperfectly bothered. It is NOT OK to, decades later, still grieve over a lost child or other tragedy.
********
Thank you, John. I do believe that a lot of Jesus authority and what made the religious leaders angry at Him was that He DID speak about what was true - not change truth into something that the religious people could weave into a kind of bondage where the little people could never be fully free as long as they mourned - or felt spiritually empty - or whatever....
40 years I have had a severely handicapped son. The "wisdom" was that if I would have put him into an institution, then I could have "had a life". What is a mother's life if it is not her children? (And I have since learned that there were some abuse issues at that institution... How could I have ever forgiven myself if he had been abused?) I mourn - yes - for what he could have been - for the frustration he has because of his handicaps - also for people I have lost who could have had richer lives - but did not... For so many other sad things and evils of this world. Marcos, would you DARE say I am less of a Christian - less blessed - because I am not ecstatically happy - as some of my Pentecostal friends are? Would you say I am less spiritual because I do not deny and rationalize away the horrors I see around me? I wish that someday it would be OK to talk about real things - to process real pain - in our church communities. We would be healthier and our children would not think of us as hypocrites so much as they do.

design trends said...

John,

I really appreciate the fresh new perspective you bring to the beatitudes. I certainly don't think that the traditional view is the only way that this passage can be understood and its awesome to see a different perspective.

Are you currently doing a series on the beatitudes? If you are, would you be able to record them in audio? Id like to hear them (listening is so much easier than reading, lol).

design trends said...

Karolynkas

You are totally right when you say that religion has become institutionalized. It seems that its the natural human inclination to take something that is meant to be mysterious and powerful and turn it into something we can manage and handle. While I am all for organization, I wish the church could go back to being a movement and not just an institution.

Your frustrations over openness in the church are the same frustrations I have had in the past. I hate the Sabbath morning answer everyone gives when you ask them how they are doing. We tend to plaster a fake smile on our faces and walk around as if everything is OK because if we don't then we are not holy. Like yourself, I resent such a philosophy.

When I look at the beatitudes and see the promise that Jesus makes to comfort us I recognize that that promise cannot and will not always be fulfilled in this life. A mother who has lost her child will never be the same. Not until Jesus returns and she gets her child back. Being in a perpetual state of anguish over that doesn't make you less spiritual. Jesus was a man of sorrows and He was as spiritual as they come.

I think part of our "fakeness" in church is due to our misconception of faith and holiness. I also think our culture plays a role. Pain can be a good thing. In my own life I have experienced deep sorrow for the sins of my life. There was nothing wrong with that sorrow. I needed it. It helped me grow. But because of our culture and expectations when I went to church I had a smile on my face. There were times when I would get up and preach about joy and feel so broken inside. I wish I could have preached about being broken. I think the church would have been more blessed by that but at the same time I felt that I had to act as though everything was OK.

My wife has also had these same struggles. She hates the proverbial pastors wife who walks around with a smile on her face like nothing ever bothers her. She likes to be real and honest. I am convinced that while we don't always have to walk around looking glum (we can have hope in the promise) we shouldn't feel as though we always have to walk around like we live in Wang-doodle land either.

Anyways, those are just some of my thoughts. And quite frankly, when it comes to the whole happiness thing, I feel that if we were more honest in our churches and processed raw emotions without some kind of mask, many more of us would experience true happiness as opposed to pretending that we do to make everyone around us comfortable.

karolynkas said...

@ Marcos, The institution is the bones of the church. We ALL need bones for structure - or we would be formless. But it is unwise for the bones to think they can operate without muscles and sinew and hearts and brains.... Then they would be just "dry bones".
There are many problems with being "traditional".... (And i would question if this verse "traditionally" has been interpreted as sorrow for sin... It seems to me pretty clear it is for those with grief and tears. I have been reading the Bible longer than you have been alive and that is how I have always read it and have heard it.)
... We do not live in a "traditional" world. We live in a world where "knowledge increases" and people "go to and fro" - in ways that would have amazed Daniel. "traditional" was determined by past generations to answer the needs and questions ad situations of the day.. The world your children and grandchildren will live in differs in many ways that often cause "tradition" to no longer be applicable. I would suggest four: - 1) in past times literacy and education was limited to a select few. They were considered experts and to be listened to and not argued with. Now education and literacy is the rule rather than the exception.
2) In past times books were rare and expensive. To study one not only had to have books - but be fluent in Latin - or German if one was into science. In our day we have the Internet - unimaginable information - and most is translated - or most educated people learn a second language.
3) No longer do we have a national culture that emulates "The Melting Pot" where immigrants give up their language, culture, & heritage to merge into the "American Dream". (In other words - where one way of living is "right" and "proper".) Rather the younger generations travel and study to learn the cultural heritage that has been lost. My grandparents thought one was either Christian - or not religious. That was their world. My friends and kids have the options of many many different religions - including many that they consider more truthful, respectful & honorable than the Christianity that they have witnessed. Many turn to Islam, Baha'i, WICCA, Buddhism and others because they cannot find health in Christianity. many turn to addictions because they cannot find health in Christianity.
4) About in the "70s minorities started getting graduate degrees and publishing - in the '80s children of alcoholics and other dysfunctional families started getting degrees and publishing - in the '80s also research on physiology began to be done using the electron microscope. All of these - including the space race - have totally changed the way we think and understand everything. ...Including religion and relationships. Those who are in recovery from addictions and abuse now SEE and KNOW the ways that traditional theology is unhealthy in so very many ways...
So - "tradition" needs to be reconsidered - church authority needs to be questioned. The younger generations no longer respect just a man - even The Pope - as authority just because of the title and position.
All these things matter if one is going to try to take the gospel to the world. - To the real people out there.

karolynkas said...

#2 - @ Marcos: There is a very subtle difference between the preaching of "mourning" being sadness for sin - and "mourning" being grief at the tragedies of life.
Religion has a history of being misused by those who want to dominate. People who are recovering from abuse maybe see this more than most. Hannah goes to cry her tears before God's Throne in the temple because her life has become intolerable - and the priest happens by and tells her basically - "You are drunk"... "Go Home" - "Sin no more" - Be happy with the status you are in" - "work hard to do what you are supposed to: take care of your husband and hos other family, be productive, be happy..." "Don't be an emotionally unstable, angry, histrionic woman who makes it hard for the rest of us..." ...all the things I have heard religion say to the broken hearted who are grieving intolerable lives. So: 1) She takes his authority that she is sinful because she grieves the status quo and goes home and tries her best to be what she is told she should be - lives an unfulfilled life (invisible - in a virtual Burka) and we never her from her again. (Remember - her husband also told her that his love should be enough to sustain her.) ...OR 2) She dares to talk back to the priest - he blesses her - God hears her tears - and God blesses not only Hannah but the Nation of Israel with Samuel.
There is a way of controlling people by always telling them they are sinful and imperfect so they have to listen to the religious authority. It is a kind of abuse that continually debases them. It is something that "power and control" seekers, cult leaders, manipulators, and predators do. If I interpret this verse as I am sinful and should be sorrowing for that... then it reinforces the script that I, and so many other women have be raised with, that we will NEVER be good enough to have autonomy and to have the right to think and have authority and self-determination that white men get in our country. (The unrest in the world has a lot to do with the issue of women's rights to be people.) We only have the right of Cinderella to be the one to clean and pick up after and take the blame for everything that goes wrong for the men in our lives.
But if Jesus said that God hears our tears - then He respects us as HIS - as real people with real lives - with potential - with autonomy. Jesus BOUGHT my right to be a person - no one - not my pastor - not my father - not my husband has the right to take that away. I matters how one interprets that verse.
By the way - Pastor John has a uniquely anointed ministry. You are right to follow his writings.

design trends said...

@ Karolynkas

Excellent points! I especially like when you said, "... We do not live in a "traditional" world. We live in a world where "knowledge increases" and people "go to and fro" - in ways that would have amazed Daniel."

I couldn't agree more.

Now, just to clarify, when I say that I take the traditional interpretation of this text I don't mean that I do so because it is traditional. I say that because as I study the text in its context and its original language I see a lot of evidence that the traditional view is good. However, by saying that I don't mean that to say this text is referring to sorrow for suffering is wrong. As far as I can tell, the text can be viewed both ways. But hey, if someone disagrees with me, this is totally no big deal. its not a mountain I wish to die on :)

What you say regarding the consequences of interpreting this text traditionally is also very true. However, that is not what I propose. Sorrow for sin is not a "live in misery wallowing in self pity all your life" kind of thing. It simply means true repentance as opposed to false repentance. I have experienced true repentance in my life. it hurt a lot more than the fake stuff. it healed a lot more too. I believe Jesus wants us to experience true repentance and I believe this verse teaches that. But like I said, if you disagree that's OK. No big deal.

karolynkas said...

What I said was that many will use the shortcomings of people in order to control them.

karolynkas said...

There is a very lot of spiritual abuse in our churches.

karolynkas said...

There is a very lot of spiritual abuse in our churches.
You say it does not matter which interpretation one has. That may be true for YOU. I DO understand sorrow for sin & the need for reconciliation with God. However, for ME it matters very much. If you do not understand why your ministry will never reach the most needy.

karolynkas said...

It occurs to me that the difference between Jesus saying one should grieve for sin and repent V.S. that there is blessing and comfort for those who weep - the first one the hearer still has control over his life - he sinned - he can put it right.... Protestantism is full of the "work ethic" if one is "good" and "industrious" then they will be blessed. If they repent when they sin - then, again, everything will be good and blessed.
But for those who grieve inconsolably... "Rachael weeping for her children and she cannot be comforted because they are not..." - for those who grieve there is NOTHING they can do to make things better. The tragedy is eternal - it is not something that they EVER had power or control over - it is Step 1 - one realizes he/she is powerless.... It is the middle aged man lying in the ER with a heart attack. All of his strength and health and ability to do stuff is suddenly gone - all of his dreams and hopes and plans. If he is blessed - he might have enough time left on life-support to do a will and say "goodbye" to his family. It is grief without power - it is hopelessness and loss of humanity - everything that gives a person value.
Pastor John, as a member of that male brotherhood of ordained pastors, you have a part in all of that debate regarding theology and such. And I know there is a lot of testosterone and egos and vying for oneupmanship in all of that discussion. I know that they have a right to claim you and to ask for accountability to them for how you preach.
....But your ministry ALSO belongs to Rachael & her brothers and sisters. It would certainly be tragic if those who would desire only to debate ever stole from Rachael the blessings that Jesus has intended for her and the others who know they "cannot pull themselves up by their bootstraps".
...Though I WOULD like to think that men who do not believe that Jesus would bless Rachel - and preach that way - have no idea how much they hurt those who are most needy and hurting. Thank you for your ministry.

Carroll said...

I have asked God for help in interpreting a neighbor's cues and responding from where she's coming from. She has never learned to trust. She is in a verbally abusive relationship. She has constant chronic pain from multiple surgeries and only learned about God from concluding nature had to have a Creator. Her parents rejected her from birth. If she visits them, she rings the bell - and they say: "What are you here for"? Today I repeated to her the quote on my calendar: "When God measures a person, he puts the tape around the heart not the head." Her eyes lit up in wonder. I told her I was impressed by her belief in God - even if it presented in yelling to him out of frustration at first. To this day she has told no one but me about her life. I said I saw her heart as being good because she did not retaliate or ask for revenge - just for her basic needs. She replied: "Maybe the best revenge is love." I told her our pastor was speaking on the fourth beatitude tomorrow - and that until I saw her again for her to think of my seeing God holding her in his hand looking for ways to intervene for her good. "You know," she said, "that gives me hope." Not profound, like your sermon - no demons involved - but my personal pre-sermon experience of someone desperate for mercy. I grew up never thinking God was happy with me. He loved me. I depended on him. However, I was not "enough". This feeling/belief is being diluted.

Carroll said...

Been thinking a lot about the legalistic lens I was steeped in from early childhood that was part of my not knowing how to let the words of grace that I believed reach my heart core - so that I fought feeling "not good enough." As you pointed out in the ten commandments, it's hard to apply perfectionism to "do not kill," etc. In the beatitudes, however, it is a new/enlarging idea for me to look at this familiar part of the sermon on the mount as blessings to the desperate and unworthy. If "poor in spirit" and "meekness" in context, for example, are descriptions of God's extending grace to broken people - I see how the characteristics Christ presented are not a list to be sought after. If they were virtues, it might be easy to see them as a legalistic list of "rules" to attain and by which to "judge" one's performance (and others') - thus distorting the purpose. Just wondering as I learn . . .