Preliminary manuscript
Sermon for North Hill Adventist
Fellowship
Sabbath, June 2, 2012
Texts: Luke 13:10-17, John 12:1-8
One Sabbath, when Jesus was at church,
he noticed a woman bent over double. She had been this way for 18
years. It broke Jesus' heart. He hurt with the pain of her twisted
back.
Jesus called her over. She hobbled over
to him. “Woman,” he said. “You are made well.” Then he
touched her and instantly she was healed. She straightened up. Whole.
Erect. Beautiful.”
She made a lot of noise praising God.
The leader of synagogue also made some
noise. It was not happy noise. He grumped. He fumed. He said, loudly,
to the audience, “It's Sabbath, folks. There are six days for doing
work. If you want to get healed come on some day other than Sabbath.
What do you think this is? A hospital?”
Jesus was not about to let it go.
“You hypocrite!” he said. “You
untie your ox or your donkey from its stall on the Sabbath and lead
it out for water, don't you? And you think nothing of it because,
your tradition (rightly) teaches that even animals have standing as
living being on Sabbath. The Sabbath commandment explicitly expresses
regard for animals. So, you'll give routine, ordinary care to the
children of cows and donkeys, but you would forbid healing for this
dear woman, a daughter of Abraham????? You miserable hypocrite! This
woman, this daughter of Abraham has been held in bondage by Satan for
eighteen years. Isn't it right that she be released, even on the
Sabbath?"
The synagogue leader was speechless. It
was true. Jewish tradition did recognize the moral standing of
animals. Even cows and donkeys had a claim on “humane” care on
the Sabbath. And certainly a woman—even though the ruler would have
regarded her as lower than a man—would have a higher claim than a
cow.
We laugh at the Pharisees because of
their preoccupation with rules and regulations. But we laugh at them
only because we aren't committed to the exact same rules and
regulations. But we are just as vigorous in defending the rules and
regulations that matter to us.
Some Americans think the children of
illegal immigrants should not be allowed to go to public schools.
Why? Because they hate kids? No. Because they are concerned to
preserve the integrity of national borders and the rule of law. But
note, this is a clear case where the well-being of living, breathing
human beings collides with legal niceties.
Jesus repeatedly demonstrated his
highest commitment was to human well-being. If people were hungry, he
fed them. If they were possessed by demons, he rescued them. If they
were sick he healed them. If they were blind, he gave them sight.
Jesus' number one priority was making people whole.
Should not this daughter of Abraham be
loosed? The answer is always yes.
A second story.
Jesus was at a feast hosted by his
friend Lazarus and catered by Lazarus' sister Martha. During the
dinner, Lazarus and Martha's sister Mary slipped in and, while
everyone was eating, began kissing Jesus' feet. She had with her a
container of world-class perfume. It was so valuable, it cost a
year's wages, so what . . . $30,000 to $40,000?
Her behavior, kissing Jesus' feet in
public was scandalous enough. Pouring thousands of dollars worth of
perfume on Jesus' feet was truly over the top.
Jesus was an extraordinary person. He
evoked unusual behavior in people. Once people ripped open a roof to
get their friend into the presence of Jesus. Once, that we know of,
when he was preaching on the beach the crowds pressed in him so
intensely they were going to shove him out into the lake. He ended up
preaching from a boat.
So here was this woman, in a society
that separated men and women far more strictly than we do, kissing
Jesus feet and pouring thousands of dollars worth of perfume over
them.
One of Jesus' disciples, Judas, the guy
who served as treasurer, began muttering: What a waste! She should
have given the perfume to Jesus in an intact container, then we could
have sold it and used the money to make a real difference in people's
lives. Think of all the poor people we could have helped with this
money.
(John, who tells us this story, reports
that Judas was not really interested in the poor. He was interested
in the disciples' bank account which he managed . . . and which he
helped himself to on occasion.)
Jesus did not let it go.
“Judas.” Jesus stared at his
disciple. When he had Judas full attention, Jesus said, “Leave her
alone. She did this to prepare me for burial.” The implication was
that any expense was justified. In that culture, it was customary to
spend lavishly on burials. It was the way you showed respect. Even
Judas would not have dared to question this expense out loud, if he
had recognized it as a part of a burial.
Different versions of this story are
told in each of the four gospels. In the different accounts Jesus
says different things.
In Matthew and Mark, Jesus says, “Why
are you criticizing this woman for doing such a good thing for me.
(The word “good” can also be translated, “beautiful.” -- She
has done a beautiful thing. ) You'll have the poor with you
always. And you can always do them good. (That will be something
beautiful you can do. But this is her beautiful thing. So, leave her
alone.) You will not always have me with you. What she has done is
so sweet, so good, that everywhere the gospel is preached this story
will be told in her honor.”
Judas was critical. Jesus was
affirming.
Jesus is our model. He calls us to join
him in doing everything in our power to protect and defend the
vulnerable. He calls us to renounce criticism as a way of life.
The synagogue leader and Judas both had
positions of prominence. They thought their status made their
critical judgment especially important. But they were wrong. Their
status imposed on them a greater obligation to affirm, to encourage,
to ease the troubles of others.
How do we apply this in real life—in
our real life?
Let go of criticism as a way of
life. Do not allow yourself to regularly, habitually criticize your kids,
your spouse, your parents, your co-workers, your boss, your
employees. There are times when you need to say something negative.
Sometimes you have to speak up. Just as Jesus did in these two
situations. He pushed back against the synagogue ruler and against
Judas. But he did that only to create space and safety for vulnerable
people who were being squeezed by those with higher status.
One step further, for some people, the
hardest step of all: let go of criticism of yourself. If you find
yourself constantly scolding yourself, constantly condemning
yourself, replace your natural self-talk with the words of Jesus:
Should not this daughter of Abraham be set free? Leave her alone. She
has done a good work for me.
Jesus' response to brokenness was not
condemnation but compassion. So, when you see in your own life
evidence that you are broken, instead of condemning yourself or
scolding yourself, react with compassion. Jesus sees your mess ups,
then looks beyond them to a good future. He calls you to do the same.
Karin and I recently visited an old
friend. One thing stood out to me over the course of our
conversation: She was constantly telling stories of human failure.
Friends, relatives, clergy, church members, employers—they all
provided examples of human failure, imperfection. Near the end of our
conversation, our friend said, “I've come to see that my
relationship with God is characterized by fear. I'm afraid God is
going to condemn me.”
I thought, no wonder. As we develop our
expertise in noticing human failure, we can't help noticing our own
failures. From there it is a very small step to assuming God is a
specialist in human failure also—a specialist in our failures. And
we assume he frowns every time he notices any element in our
existence that is less than ideal. He frowns and he will punish.
This poisons our own life and
diminishes our capacity to pour grace into the lives of others.
Jesus calls us higher.
Jesus says about us: Ought not this
daughter, this son of Abraham be set free? Today. Now. No matter
whether it's in the program or not.
Jesus says about our best efforts—even
if others are critical—she/he has done what they could. It was a
beautiful thing. Leave them alone.
Jesus is touched by our brokenness. He
is pleased with our efforts. Take heart.
5 comments:
Of course how critical one is and how they communicate it depends on the circumstance. You would not want the trainer for a neurosurgeon to say, "It's OK - You were only two centimeters off when you cut that brain...".
However, for the ecology minded out there: It hurts me to have to throw so much good stuff out rather than recycle. But the biggest asset that we "toss" rather than recycle is the many people - children and old folks - who get left behind rather than helped to get back on their feet. dog - eat - dog; survival of the fittest. I think that was why EGW was so adamant that we continue to live in the reality that Gos Created - all - ...Thanks John.
This idea of compassion is a great idea, but the core ideas of Christian theology are based on threats of death and the condemnation of the human condition.
No two Christians can even agree on how to be saved. There are over 40,000 different versions of Christianity in the world each claiming to understand the true message of the bible. It is all so vague that it leaves Christians in a constant state of fear.
It seems to me that Jesus was a humanist and got hijacked by some orthodox obsessed writers in the 2nd century that had to make him a god.
I liked both comments above. The humanist line in particular.
I also find myself slipping into the trap of lacking compassion or judging a little harshly poor behaviour that I know I don't copy and excusing poor behaviour that I often mirror. I remember a UK newspaper article that questioned why we judged Ben Johnson (the sprinter) so quickly and with such passion and yet at the same time a UK footballer caught drink driving, and well over the limit, did not even rate a mention. Sure the Olympics are high profile but the point was made that we are never going to be in Ben's position so we can judge him harshly but if we did the same of the drink driver then that is a little too close to home. We may have a family member, a colleague, a friend that has made this mistake. I often reference that article as I am about to tisk someone's behaviour.
"Jesus was a humanist." Not a bad approximation.
"He was hijacked by orthodoxy." That's for sure. Many contemporary American Christians think the Pauline/Augustinian/Calvinist/Lutheran interpretation of Jesus is the sole, true explication of Jesus. Adventists, naturally, add EGW to our interpretive lenses. The Jesus that finally comes through the eye piece can hardly be said to be the "whole Jesus."
I mentioned to a friend yesterday that all of us are free create our own pictures of Jesus starting with the data in the gospels and our own life experience. Church history and commentaries can be helpful, but they are not determinative.
Some defenders of orthodoxy threaten creative thinkers and believers with the prospect of hell. But to quote a heretic from the 2nd century: I'm not afraid of their hell.
Post a Comment