Sermon for Green Lake Church of Seventh-day Adventists
For Sabbath, November 4, 2017
Texts: Jeremiah 21:11-14, Matthew 23:1-13
Five hundred years
ago, a theology professor, Martin Luther, got into an argument with a
popular preacher named Johann Tetzel. Tetzel was preaching that a
person could reduce their punishment in the after life by giving
money to the church. Luther argued that what mattered with God was
the inward work of faith and repentance. Luther summarized his views
in a document listing 95 statements. The document is called The 95
Theses. Legend has it that he posted these statements on the door of
the Wittenberg Church on October 31, 1517.
The argument
escalated. Church officials and rich and powerful lay people got
involved. Eventually Luther, the theologian was called before a grand
council of the church, interviewed and then ordered to recant. Take
it all back. Submit to the authority of the General Conference in
Session.
He refused.
And western
Christendom split between his defenders and accusers. This split is
called the Reformation. It was the beginning of Protestant churches.
Adventists have seen
ourselves as the spiritual heirs of the great figures of the
Reformation. We celebrate the courage of Luther, Calvin, Zwingli,
Huss, and Jerome. Theologians who were true to their reading of the
Bible instead of submitting to the church-approved interpretations of
the Bible.
Now, a hundred fifty
years plus into our own church history, Seventh-day Adventists
confront the inevitable questions that arise when a group sees itself
as the descendant of protesters. How shall we respond to people
within our own denomination who believe that some element of our
belief or practice is wrong?
Another way to ask
the question is: what is the nature of church authority?
Today's Old
Testament and New Testament readings highlight the complexity of the
question. Let's begin with Jeremiah
"Say to the royal family of Judah, 'Listen to this message from
the LORD! 12 This is what the LORD says to the dynasty of David:
"'Give justice each morning to the people you judge! Help those
who have been robbed; rescue them from their oppressors. Otherwise,
my anger will burn like an unquenchable fire because of all your
sins. 13 I will personally fight against the people in Jerusalem,
that mighty fortress--the people who boast, "No one can touch us
here. No one can break in here." 14 And I myself will punish you
for your sinfulness, says the LORD. I will light a fire in your
forests that will burn up everything around you.'" Jeremiah
21:11-14
A central conviction
of the Jewish people was that God had chosen the family of David as
the royal family for all time. And that God had chosen Jerusalem as
the Holy City, the holiest place on earth. Their dream of the grand
climax of all things—the end of the world—was the day when all
nations would pay obeisance to Jerusalem. Jerusalem and the Temple
would be ackoweldged as the capitol of all nations.
Then we read the
words of Jeremiah.
Give justice each morning to the people you judge! Help those who
have been robbed; rescue them from their oppressors. Otherwise, my
anger will burn like an unquenchable fire because of all your sins.
The privileges God
had given were not automatic. They were not unconditionally
guaranteed. In the eyes of God, royal authority was dependent on
royal character. And the primary measure of royal character was how
the royal family used its power to help the little people, people
with meager resources.
In the Adventist
Church the “royalty” are the clergy. In our system clergy have
the most power. Traditionally, like Catholics and the Church of
Christ and the Lutheran Church Missouri Synod and many other
denominations, we have claimed that our church is the one true
church. Further, we have argued that truth is determined by the vote
of the clergy. No matter what you think, the final court of appeal is
the vote of the assembled clergy at our General Conference session.
Which brings us to
our New Testament reading.
Then Jesus said to the crowds and to his disciples, 2 "The
teachers of religious law and the Pharisees are the official
interpreters of the law of Moses. 3 So practice and obey whatever
they tell you, but don't follow their example. For they don't
practice what they teach. 4 They crush people with unbearable
religious demands and never lift a finger to ease the burden. 5
"Everything they do is for show. On their arms they wear extra
wide prayer boxes with Scripture verses inside, and they wear robes
with extra long tassels. 6 And they love to sit at the head table at
banquets and in the seats of honor in the synagogues. 7 They love to
receive respectful greetings as they walk in the marketplaces, and to
be called 'Rabbi.' 8 "Don't let anyone call you 'Rabbi,' for you
have only one teacher, and all of you are equal as brothers and
sisters. 9 And don't address anyone here on earth as 'Father,' for
only God in heaven is your spiritual Father. 10 And don't let anyone
call you 'Teacher,' for you have only one teacher, the Messiah. 11
The greatest among you must be a servant. 12 But those who exalt
themselves will be humbled, and those who humble themselves will be
exalted. 13 "What sorrow awaits you teachers of religious law
and you Pharisees. Hypocrites! For you shut the door of the Kingdom
of Heaven in people's faces. You won't go in yourselves, and you
don't let others enter either. Matthew 23:1-13 NLT (Accessed through
Blue Letter Bible.org)
This passage
highlights the importance of careful interpretation. Note the opening
words
"The teachers of religious law and the Pharisees are the
official interpreters of the law of Moses. 3 So practice and obey
whatever they tell you,
It sounds like Jesus
is endorsing the absolute authority of the teachings of religious
officials. “They are the official interpreters, so do whatever they
tell you.” I can see the clergy looking at each other and smiling.
Elbowing each other and whispering. “Did you hear that?” They are
all thinking, this Jesus fellow is not so bad. He's right. We do
have the correct interpretation. It is rebellion to contradict us or
disobey us.
Then Jesus
continues,
but don't follow their example. For they don't practice what they
teach. 4 They crush people with unbearable religious demands and
never lift a finger to ease the burden.
They crush people
with unbearable demands. Wait. Are we really supposed to obey
“unbearable demands?” No. These words echo the words of Peter in
Acts 15, when the church leaders were debating how much of Jewish
tradition to impose on Gentile believers. Peter said, “Why would we
even think of imposing on our Gentile brothers and sisters a burden
we ourselves were unable to bear? Enough already!” Acts 15:10.
When clergy impose
unbearable burdens, we are free to ignore them. Sometimes, like
Martin Luther of old, we are obliged to actively resist them.
Jesus goes further.
8 "Don't let anyone call you 'Rabbi,' for you have only one
teacher, and all of you are equal as brothers and sisters. 9 And
don't address anyone here on earth as 'Father,' for only God in
heaven is your spiritual Father. 10 And don't let anyone call you
'Teacher,' for you have only one teacher, the Messiah. 11 The
greatest among you must be a servant.
We could fixate on
specific terms here. “Rabbi,” “Father,” “Teacher.” But
that would obviously miss the point. The point of these titles is
status and authority. We can be tempted to yield to the assertions
and claims of people with titles--Rabbi, Father, Teacher, president,
professor—without subjecting those claims to the tests of truth and
love.
In the kingdom of
heaven formal authority yields to the higher authority of truth and
love.
It is tempting for
us to use our status as a substitute for persuasion and honesty. When
someone in authority agrees with us, it is tempting to use their
status as a substitute for doing our own careful thinking and
research.
Jesus rebuked the
religious leaders of his day because they imagined their status as a
platform for the exercise of power. Then Jesus pointed to the right
use of status: The greatest among you must be a servant.
The enduring legacy
of the Reformation is not a list of theological propositions. Rather
it is an open door to the ever relevant challenge of Jesus: What are
we doing with the power God has placed in our hands? Are we committed
to the preservation of our church documents--”the 28” or “The
Church Manual”--even when they imposed unbearable burdens? Or will
we join Jesus in bending every resource toward serving those with
less—less power, less orthodoxy, less money, less health, less
status?
Greatness, in the
kingdom of heaven, is measured in units of service not in units of
orthodoxy.
Application: Consider the recent attempts to require a loyalty oath and the recent letter by Jim Pederson, president of the Northern California Conference, which cited church authority alone as reason to exclude some people from church membership.
No comments:
Post a Comment